2004 to 2020 Mazda 3 Forum and Mazdaspeed 3 Forums banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
418 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
I'm comparing specs on the different reusable panel filters that we have as options. I can not seem to find the dimensions of the JBR or AFE (Pro Dry S) filters. Length and width of course are not as important, it is the height that I'd really like to know.

If anyone has one of these, any chance you could quickly measure it?


For reference.. here is what I have so far...

OEM nn.n% Efficiency, 10.65(l) x 7.08(w) x 1.710(h) ... (PE07-13-3A0A)
AEM 99.0% Efficiency, 10.75(l) x 7.12(w) x 1.625(h) ... (28-20480)
K&N nn.n% Efficiency, 10.75(l) x 7.12(w) x 1.188(h) ... (33-2480)

JBR nn.n% Efficiency, nn.nn(l) x n.nn(w) x n.nnn(h) ... (SKY-PNL-FLT)
AFE 99.2% Efficiency, nn.nn(l) x n.nn(w) x n.nnn(h) ... (31-10251 Pro Dry S)



** UPDATE **

Measured the AFE ..

AFE 99.2% Efficiency, 10.75(l) x 7.25(w) x 1.5(h) ... (31-10251 Pro Dry S)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
418 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Well I sent an email to JBR a few days ago asking them what their Efficiency Rating was and if they happened to know what their CFM was. I know they claim 0.1 Micron but I can't compare apples to oranges.

I have yet to hear back. So after alot of comparisons, I think the AFE is going to be the best option.

I actually have a little Flow test method where I was going to buy each of the filters and run them on my rig to see which actually allowed the most air flow, but that would require me to buy all 3 (JBR, Afe, AEM) and then deal with trying to return 2 of them)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
441 Posts
I actually have a little Flow test method where I was going to buy each of the filters and run them on my rig to see which actually allowed the most air flow, but that would require me to buy all 3 (JBR, Afe, AEM) and then deal with trying to return 2 of them)
You'd only need 2 of them. The AEM & JBR are the same filter. The JBR is just colored black. You could add the K&N, though, which is oiled.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
418 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Actually I just bought the AFE... I had sent an email to JBR with some clarification questions and they never got back to me. So I went with the 99.2%.

Fyi... I did some air flow testing between a basically new OEM filter, a dirty OEM filter, and this new AFE filter.

I'm going to repeat all my test and post on a new thread, but basically the dirty filter flowed ~10% less and the AFE flowed 19% more.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
418 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 · (Edited)
Since you've had the AFE filter out while dicking around with your flow test, why haven't you posted up the dimensions for the AFE on your 1st post? Complete the full picture! This may help explain your flow results......

Thanks for the kick in the ass... but I did update the OP about a week ago. Under "UPDATE" :)


I will say, now that I've measured one in person, I can see that the "claimed" measurements don't really help. For example, the AFE is longer and wider, but that part is just the rubber frame. It completely makes a difference though because the OEM filter has some play in it and the AFE has none...nice snug and sealed fit.

To truly get the Surface area, I'd have to measure the actual Filtration section and how deep the pleats are.. and then do a bunch of math!
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top