A little thought experiment for discussion...
From what I've read, each 1000 feet of elevation equals about 3% power loss. So at my home near Denver, CO (elevation ~5500ft) total loss is about 16.5%. Which means:
My 2.5L 185HP Mazda 3sGT = 155HP
A 2.0L 155HP Mazda 3 = 130HP
My previous car, a 1.8L 120HP Corolla = moped
The obvious answer to regain power is forced induction. Altitude is why turbochargers were invented in the first place (think airplanes). But it seems to be a no-go in these engines, and it's well outside my price range anyway. Although I'm curious if a low boost turbo setup would actually work OK. Anyone with thoughts on this?
But onto my main topic: What about the OV tune? Could it be as effective here as in other locations? Or will the gains be reduced by altitude also? Would I only gain a few HP, whereas someone at sea level and other ideal conditions could get much more? Consider that 85 octane is regular here, and 91 is the highest carried by most stations.
From what I've read, each 1000 feet of elevation equals about 3% power loss. So at my home near Denver, CO (elevation ~5500ft) total loss is about 16.5%. Which means:
My 2.5L 185HP Mazda 3sGT = 155HP
A 2.0L 155HP Mazda 3 = 130HP
My previous car, a 1.8L 120HP Corolla = moped
The obvious answer to regain power is forced induction. Altitude is why turbochargers were invented in the first place (think airplanes). But it seems to be a no-go in these engines, and it's well outside my price range anyway. Although I'm curious if a low boost turbo setup would actually work OK. Anyone with thoughts on this?
But onto my main topic: What about the OV tune? Could it be as effective here as in other locations? Or will the gains be reduced by altitude also? Would I only gain a few HP, whereas someone at sea level and other ideal conditions could get much more? Consider that 85 octane is regular here, and 91 is the highest carried by most stations.